Grateful Borders: Why the East Gets a Pass, But the West Gets Called Xenophobic

Economic opportunity drives migration—everywhere. People chase jobs, stability, better lives. In the West—US, Canada, Europe, Australia—they come for that, sure, but also for freedom. And here’s the kicker: we offer a path. Permanent residency, citizenship, a shot at joining the grateful order. In East Asia — Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan—it’s different. They pull workers from South Asia, Southeast Asia, China. Japan’s got 3.8 million foreigners, South Korea 2.5 million, Singapore 1.6 million non-residents. But it’s temporary. Contracts, no citizenship, no allegiance. You work, you leave. No Judeo-Western pillars, no assimilation — just labor.

So why does the West get slammed as xenophobic if we even hint at tighter borders, while the East skates free? Japan keeps its population 97% homogenous, South Korea 95% — no one calls them racist. Why? Because the West is supposed to be the “open” one. When we set rules to protect what was built, people cry foul. The East? They never promised openness, so no one expects it.

It’s a double standard. But here’s the truth: Gratitude isn’t about open doors—it’s about order. Our pillars — personal accountability, cultural assimilation, allegiance to the Constitution — mean we filter. Not out of hate, but prudence. The East doesn’t need to. They don’t offer permanence, so they dodge the backlash.

America was founded and primarily built by settlers and their descendants — the original inhabitants after colonization — who created the framework, laws, and expansion through natural growth and hard work. Immigration added to it, strengthened it, and helped scale the success we see today. But if we abandoned our path to citizenship for those who earn it through gratitude and alignment, we’d lose what makes America exceptional. Let’s keep grateful gates — legal, vetted, permanent for those committed to the pillars. Not chaos. Not exclusion. Just order.

(Quick table for clarity)

RegionMigration TypePath to Citizenship?Why No Backlash?
West (US, Europe, etc.)Permanent + temporaryYes—legal pathwaysExpectations of openness lead to cries of “xenophobia” when rules are enforced
East Asia (Japan, SK, Singapore)Mostly temporaryNo—strict, rareNever promised openness, so no one expects it

Stand firm. Share your thoughts @Grateful1776US.

– The Grateful Immigrant from St. Paul, Minnesota

February 15, 2026

LIVE GRATEFUL 🇺🇸

Leave a comment